lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:26:38 +0200
From:   Thomas Hellström (VMware) 
        <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dma coherent memory user-space maps

On 10/8/19 2:34 PM, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> Hi, Christoph,
>
> Following our previous discussion I wonder if something along the 
> lines of the following could work / be acceptible
>
> typedef unsigned long dma_pfn_t /* Opaque pfn type. Arch dependent. 
> This could if needed be a struct with a pointer and an offset */
>
> /* Similar to vmf_insert_mixed() */
> vm_fault_t dma_vmf_insert_mixed(struct device *dev,
>                 struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                 unsigned long addr,
>                 dma_pfn_t dpfn,
>                 unsigned long attrs);
>
> /* Similar to vmf_insert_pfn_pmd() */
> vm_fault_t dma_vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(struct device *dev,
>                   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                   unsigned long addr,
>                   dma_pfn_t dpfn,
>                   unsigned long attrs);
>
> /* Like vmap, but takes struct dma_pfns. */
> extern void *dma_vmap(struct device *dev,
>               dma_pfn_t dpfns[],
>               unsigned int count, unsigned long flags,
>               unsigned long attrs);
>
> /* Obtain struct dma_pfn pointers from a dma coherent allocation */
> int dma_get_dpfns(struct device *dev, void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t 
> dma_addr,
>           pgoff_t offset, pgoff_t num, dma_pfn_t dpfns[]);
>
> I figure, for most if not all architectures we could use an ordinary 
> pfn as dma_pfn_t, but the dma layer would still have control over how 
> those pfns are obtained and how they are used in the kernel's mapping 
> APIs.
>
> If so, I could start looking at this, time permitting,  for the cases 
> where the pfn can be obtained from the kernel address or from 
> arch_dma_coherent_to_pfn(), and also the needed work to have a 
> tailored vmap_pfn().
>
> Thanks,
> /Thomas
>
>
Ping?

Thanks,

Thomas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ