linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf tools: Support single perf.data file directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191021140323.GC10039@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:03:23 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf tools: Support single perf.data file directory

Em Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:42:39PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 7/10/19 3:06 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 7/10/19 2:20 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> SNIP
> >>
> >>>  	u8 pad[8] = {0};
> >>>  
> >>> -	if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && !perf_data__is_dir(data)) {
> >>> +	if (!perf_data__is_pipe(data) && perf_data__is_single_file(data)) {
> >>>  		off_t file_offset;
> >>>  		int fd = perf_data__fd(data);
> >>>  		int err;
> >>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data.c b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> index df173f0bf654..964ea101dba6 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data.c
> >>> @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ int perf_data__open_dir(struct perf_data *data)
> >>>  	DIR *dir;
> >>>  	int nr = 0;
> >>>  
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * Directory containing a single regular perf data file which is already
> >>> +	 * open, means there is nothing more to do here.
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	if (perf_data__is_single_file(data))
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> cool, I like this approach much more than the previous flag
> > 
> > Yes it is much nicer.  Thanks for your direction on that.
> > 
> >>
> >> any change you (if there's repost) or Arnaldo
> >> could squeeze in indent change below?
> > 
> > Sent a patch, to be applied before these.
> > 
> 
> That is:
> 
> "[PATCH] perf session: Fix indent in perf_session__new()"

Done it as a separate patch, etc.
 
> Any comments on this patch set Arnaldo?

-- 

- Arnaldo