linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 19/22] RISC-V: KVM: Remove per-CPU vsip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:39:30 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Radim K <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 19/22] RISC-V: KVM: Remove per-CPU vsip_shadow variable

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:58 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 16/10/19 18:12, Anup Patel wrote:
> > Currently, we track last value wrote to VSIP CSR using per-CPU
> > vsip_shadow variable but this easily goes out-of-sync because
> > Guest can update VSIP.SSIP bit directly.
> >
> > To simplify things, we remove per-CPU vsip_shadow variable and
> > unconditionally write vcpu->arch.guest_csr.vsip to VSIP CSR in
> > run-loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
>
> Please squash this and patch 20 into the corresponding patches earlier
> in the series.

Sure, I will squash patch20 and patch19 onto patch5.

Regards,
Anup


>
> Paolo
>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ---
> >  arch/riscv/kvm/main.c             |  6 ------
> >  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c             | 24 +-----------------------
> >  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index ec1ca4bc98f2..cd86acaed055 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -202,9 +202,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> >  static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
> >  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> >
> > -int kvm_riscv_setup_vsip(void);
> > -void kvm_riscv_cleanup_vsip(void);
> > -
> >  #define KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
> >  int kvm_unmap_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                       unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> > index 55df85184241..002301a27d29 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/main.c
> > @@ -61,17 +61,11 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
> >
> >  int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
> >  {
> > -     int ret;
> > -
> >       if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, h)) {
> >               kvm_info("hypervisor extension not available\n");
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >       }
> >
> > -     ret = kvm_riscv_setup_vsip();
> > -     if (ret)
> > -             return ret;
> > -
> >       kvm_riscv_stage2_vmid_detect();
> >
> >       kvm_info("hypervisor extension available\n");
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > index fd77cd39dd8c..f1a218d3a8cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > @@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ static void kvm_riscv_vcpu_host_fp_restore(struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx) {}
> >                                riscv_isa_extension_mask(s) | \
> >                                riscv_isa_extension_mask(u))
> >
> > -static unsigned long __percpu *vsip_shadow;
> > -
> >  static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >       struct kvm_vcpu_csr *csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_csr;
> > @@ -765,7 +763,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> >  {
> >       struct kvm_vcpu_csr *csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_csr;
> > -     unsigned long *vsip = raw_cpu_ptr(vsip_shadow);
> >
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSSTATUS, csr->vsstatus);
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSIE, csr->vsie);
> > @@ -775,7 +772,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSCAUSE, csr->vscause);
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSTVAL, csr->vstval);
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSIP, csr->vsip);
> > -     *vsip = csr->vsip;
> >       csr_write(CSR_VSATP, csr->vsatp);
> >
> >       kvm_riscv_stage2_update_hgatp(vcpu);
> > @@ -843,26 +839,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  static void kvm_riscv_update_vsip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >       struct kvm_vcpu_csr *csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_csr;
> > -     unsigned long *vsip = raw_cpu_ptr(vsip_shadow);
> > -
> > -     if (*vsip != csr->vsip) {
> > -             csr_write(CSR_VSIP, csr->vsip);
> > -             *vsip = csr->vsip;
> > -     }
> > -}
> > -
> > -int kvm_riscv_setup_vsip(void)
> > -{
> > -     vsip_shadow = alloc_percpu(unsigned long);
> > -     if (!vsip_shadow)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -     return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -void kvm_riscv_cleanup_vsip(void)
> > -{
> > -     free_percpu(vsip_shadow);
> > +     csr_write(CSR_VSIP, csr->vsip);
> >  }
> >
> >  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> >
>