[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-d42f23ae-e51f-49cd-9533-a4c793cd70fe@palmer-si-x1e>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: michal.simek@...inx.com
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, michal.simek@...inx.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
firoz.khan@...aro.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
longman@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI/MSI: Remove the PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN architecture whitelist
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:20:09 PDT (-0700), michal.simek@...inx.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17. 10. 19 20:19, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> This came up in the context of the microblaze port, where a patch was
>> recently posted to extend the whitelist.
>
> I hoped you were aware about this discussion we have with Christoph.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/8/682
>
> It means 1/3 and 2/3 should be replaced by mandatory-y and I expect
> msi.h can be removed from architecture Kbuild too.
I'd missed it, but that seems like a better way to do it. I'm going to assume
you guys are going to handle this, so feel free to drop my patch set.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists