[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ec42e0d-d999-d59c-628a-b7678f132f73@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:14:31 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>, michal.simek@...inx.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, helgaas@...nel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
firoz.khan@...aro.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
longman@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI/MSI: Remove the PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN architecture whitelist
On 22. 10. 19 17:10, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:20:09 PDT (-0700), michal.simek@...inx.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 17. 10. 19 20:19, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> This came up in the context of the microblaze port, where a patch was
>>> recently posted to extend the whitelist.
>>
>> I hoped you were aware about this discussion we have with Christoph.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/8/682
>>
>> It means 1/3 and 2/3 should be replaced by mandatory-y and I expect
>> msi.h can be removed from architecture Kbuild too.
>
> I'd missed it, but that seems like a better way to do it. I'm going to
> assume you guys are going to handle this, so feel free to drop my patch
> set.
Ok. I have sent it with ccing you.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists