[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c61c094-ee32-4dcf-b3ae-092eba0159c5@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:53:27 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: Terminate memslot walks via used_slots
On 22/10/19 17:52, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> Anyways, I'm not at all opposed to adding comments, just want to make sure
> I'm not forgetting something. If it's ok with you, I'll comment the code
> and/or functions and reply here to refine them without having to respin
> the whole series.
Yes, I agree this is better.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists