[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191022155307.izh4ryorm7thw7tq@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:53:07 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/36] ARM: s5pv210: split from plat-samsung
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:01:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR) += spear
> > > # by CONFIG_* macro name.
> > > plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP) += omap
> > > plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C64XX) += samsung
> > > -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210) += samsung
> >
> > Would it make more sense to make this
> >
> > plat-$(PLAT_SAMSUNG) += samsung
> >
> > (in a separate patch)? Hmm, it seems there is no plat-y for
> > PLAT_S3C24XX=y builds. Is this intended? If yes, the directory name
> > containing "samsung" suggests something that seems untrue.
>
> By the end of the series, the plat-samsung directory is completely
> removed (folded into mach-s3c), so that would only add more
> churn for the same result I think.
fine for me. The background of my question was me wondering if builds
for PLAT_S3C24XX=y (before your patch series) don't need plat-samsung.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists