[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F4AD7F7@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:30:29 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] rtc/ia64: remove legacy efirtc driver
>> rtc-efi rtc-efi: setting system clock to 2019-10-23T18:30:23 UTC (1571855423)
> You can remove CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS, this line will disappear, systemd
> will not like that but efirtc was not setting the system time anyway so
> this shouldn't change the behaviour.
Wait ... that message says "setting system clock"
but then you say " efirtc was not setting the system time anyway".
So did the time get set, or not?
If it wasn't set, why does the message say that it was set?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists