[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191023095554.11340-10-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:55:49 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/14] vsock: move vsock_insert_unbound() in the vsock_create()
vsock_insert_unbound() was called only when 'sock' parameter of
__vsock_create() was not null. This only happened when
__vsock_create() was called by vsock_create().
In order to simplify the multi-transports support, this patch
moves vsock_insert_unbound() at the end of vsock_create().
Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 95878bed2c67..d89381166028 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -634,9 +634,6 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
return NULL;
}
- if (sock)
- vsock_insert_unbound(vsk);
-
return sk;
}
@@ -1889,6 +1886,8 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
int protocol, int kern)
{
+ struct sock *sk;
+
if (!sock)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1908,7 +1907,13 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- return __vsock_create(net, sock, NULL, GFP_KERNEL, 0, kern) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+ sk = __vsock_create(net, sock, NULL, GFP_KERNEL, 0, kern);
+ if (!sk)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ vsock_insert_unbound(vsock_sk(sk));
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct net_proto_family vsock_family_ops = {
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists