| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGxU2F7n48kBy_y2GB=mcvraK=mw_2Jn8=2hvQnEOWqWuT9OjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:08:01 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/14] vsock: add multi-transports support
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:59 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds the support of multiple transports in the
> VSOCK core.
>
> With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs
> (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and
> host->guest transports at the same time.
>
> Major changes:
> - vsock core module can be loaded regardless of the transports
> - vsock_core_init() and vsock_core_exit() are renamed to
> vsock_core_register() and vsock_core_unregister()
> - vsock_core_register() has a feature parameter (H2G, G2H, DGRAM)
> to identify which directions the transport can handle and if it's
> support DGRAM (only vmci)
> - each stream socket is assigned to a transport when the remote CID
> is set (during the connect() or when we receive a connection request
> on a listener socket).
> The remote CID is used to decide which transport to use:
> - remote CID > VMADDR_CID_HOST will use host->guest transport
> - remote CID <= VMADDR_CID_HOST will use guest->host transport
> - listener sockets are not bound to any transports since no transport
> operations are done on it. In this way we can create a listener
> socket, also if the transports are not loaded or with VMADDR_CID_ANY
> to listen on all transports.
> - DGRAM sockets are handled as before, since only the vmci_transport
> provides this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
> RFC -> v1:
> - documented VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_* flags
> - fixed vsock_assign_transport() when the socket is already assigned
> (e.g connection failed)
> - moved features outside of struct vsock_transport, and used as
> parameter of vsock_core_register()
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 5 +-
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 17 +-
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 237 ++++++++++++++++++------
> net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 26 ++-
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 7 +-
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 28 ++-
> net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 31 +++-
> 7 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 6d7e4f022748..b235f4bbe8ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ static int __init vhost_vsock_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = vsock_core_init(&vhost_transport.transport);
> + ret = vsock_core_register(&vhost_transport.transport,
> + VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_H2G);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> return misc_register(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> @@ -840,7 +841,7 @@ static int __init vhost_vsock_init(void)
> static void __exit vhost_vsock_exit(void)
> {
> misc_deregister(&vhost_vsock_misc);
> - vsock_core_exit();
> + vsock_core_unregister(&vhost_transport.transport);
> };
>
> module_init(vhost_vsock_init);
> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> index fa1570dc9f5c..27a3463e4892 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data {
> u64 data2; /* Transport-defined. */
> };
>
> +/* Transport features flags */
> +/* Transport provides host->guest communication */
> +#define VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_H2G 0x00000001
> +/* Transport provides guest->host communication */
> +#define VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_G2H 0x00000002
> +/* Transport provides DGRAM communication */
> +#define VSOCK_TRANSPORT_F_DGRAM 0x00000004
> +
> struct vsock_transport {
> /* Initialize/tear-down socket. */
> int (*init)(struct vsock_sock *, struct vsock_sock *);
> @@ -154,12 +162,8 @@ struct vsock_transport {
>
> /**** CORE ****/
>
> -int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner);
> -static inline int vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t)
> -{
> - return __vsock_core_init(t, THIS_MODULE);
> -}
> -void vsock_core_exit(void);
> +int vsock_core_register(const struct vsock_transport *t, int features);
> +void vsock_core_unregister(const struct vsock_transport *t);
>
> /* The transport may downcast this to access transport-specific functions */
> const struct vsock_transport *vsock_core_get_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> @@ -190,6 +194,7 @@ struct sock *vsock_find_connected_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
> struct sockaddr_vm *dst);
> void vsock_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> void vsock_for_each_connected_socket(void (*fn)(struct sock *sk));
> +int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk);
>
> /**** TAP ****/
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index d89381166028..dddd85d9a147 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,12 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = {
> #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE (1024 * 256)
> #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MIN_SIZE 128
>
> -static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single;
> +/* Transport used for host->guest communication */
> +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g;
> +/* Transport used for guest->host communication */
> +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h;
> +/* Transport used for DGRAM communication */
> +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex);
>
> /**** UTILS ****/
> @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ static int vsock_auto_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> return __vsock_bind(sk, &local_addr);
> }
>
> -static int __init vsock_init_tables(void)
> +static void vsock_init_tables(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> @@ -191,7 +196,6 @@ static int __init vsock_init_tables(void)
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock_connected_table); i++)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vsock_connected_table[i]);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static void __vsock_insert_bound(struct list_head *list,
> @@ -376,6 +380,62 @@ void vsock_enqueue_accept(struct sock *listener, struct sock *connected)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_enqueue_accept);
>
> +/* Assign a transport to a socket and call the .init transport callback.
> + *
> + * Note: for stream socket this must be called when vsk->remote_addr is set
> + * (e.g. during the connect() or when a connection request on a listener
> + * socket is received).
> + * The vsk->remote_addr is used to decide which transport to use:
> + * - remote CID > VMADDR_CID_HOST will use host->guest transport
> + * - remote CID <= VMADDR_CID_HOST will use guest->host transport
> + */
> +int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
> +{
> + const struct vsock_transport *new_transport;
> + struct sock *sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
> +
> + switch (sk->sk_type) {
> + case SOCK_DGRAM:
> + new_transport = transport_dgram;
> + break;
> + case SOCK_STREAM:
> + if (vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid > VMADDR_CID_HOST)
> + new_transport = transport_h2g;
> + else
> + new_transport = transport_g2h;
I just noticed that this break the loopback in the guest.
As a fix, we should use 'transport_g2h' when remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST
or remote_cid is the id of 'transport_g2h'.
To do that we also need to avoid that L2 guests can have the same CID of L1.
For vhost_vsock I can call vsock_find_cid() in vhost_vsock_set_cid()
@Jorgen: for vmci we need to do the same? or it is guaranteed, since
it's already support nested VMs, that a L2 guests cannot have the
same CID as the L1.
I'll send a v2 with this fix, but I'll wait a bit for other comments.
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists