[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee1eaf7255a33bea853daaada702c66f1852bda5.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:06:25 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] arm64: Realtek RTD1295 reset controllers
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 12:13 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series adds reset controllers for the Realtek RTD1295 and RTD1195 SoCs.
>
> v2 adopts reset-simple driver and DesignWare bindings as simplification
> and covers RTD1195, too.
>
> Note that reset-simple driver would allow to cover RTD1195's reset1-3 in one
> DT node, but it only maps the first resource, so RTD1295's reset4 would need
> to remain separate due to a gap in between. I've therefore left them all as
> separate nodes for now.
>
> Also note that my initial 32-bit arm patch already selects RESET_CONTROLLER,
> to avoid needing a separate patch here to add that one line as done for arm64.
>
> If I can take the bindings patches through the Realtek tree then I can squash
> the two final DT patches depending on them into the patches added the resets,
> otherwise they need to go into v5.6 or be merged via a topic branch.
I'm fine with the DT binding patches going in through the Realtek tree,
feel free to add
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
to both. I'll just pick up patches 3 and 4.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists