lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 27 Oct 2019 06:47:55 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: sys.c: Avoid copying possible padding bytes in
 copy_to_user



On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, Joe Perches wrote:

> Initialization is not guaranteed to zero padding bytes so
> use an explicit memset instead to avoid leaking any kernel
> content in any possible padding bytes.

Here is an extract of an email that I sent to Kees at one point that left
me unsure about what should be done about these situations:

>From Kees:

    The only way to correctly handle this is:

    memset(&instance, 0, sizeof(instance));
    instance.one = 1;

>From me:

Actually, this document:

https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/DCL39-C.+Avoid+information+leakage+when+passing+a+structure+across+a+trust+boundary

says that memset is a "noncompliant solution".  They suggest declaring the
structure as packed, as well as some other more unpleasant solutions.
Their point is that 1 will be sitting in a register, and the assignment at
least might copy the upper bytes of the register into the padding space.

-------------------------

Is the memset solution nevertheless what is always wanted in the kernel
when there is padding?

thanks,
julia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ