linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI/AER: Allow clearing Error Status Register in FF mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191028232251.GA205542@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:22:51 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI/AER: Allow clearing Error Status Register in
 FF mode

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:39:01PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> As per PCI firmware specification r3.2 Downstream Port Containment
> Related Enhancements ECN, sec 4.5.1, table 4-6,

That table adds bit 7, "DPC config control" to the _OSC control field
and talks about modifying registers in the DPC capability.

It doesn't say anything about firmware-first or about the OS modifying
registers in the AER capability.  But this patch doesn't do anything
related to DPC or _OSC.

> Error Disconnect
> Recover (EDR) support allows OS to handle error recovery and
> clearing Error Registers even in FF mode. So remove FF mode checks in
> pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status(), pci_aer_clear_fatal_status()
> and pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs() functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index b45bc47d04fe..e1509bb900c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -383,9 +383,6 @@ int pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (!pos)
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
> -		return -EIO;
> -
>  	/* Clear status bits for ERR_NONFATAL errors only */
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, &status);
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER, &sev);
> @@ -406,9 +403,6 @@ void pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (!pos)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
> -		return;
> -
>  	/* Clear status bits for ERR_FATAL errors only */
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, &status);
>  	pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_SEVER, &sev);

> @@ -430,9 +424,6 @@ int pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (!pos)
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
> -		return -EIO;
> -
>  	port_type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>  	if (port_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
>  		pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &status);
> @@ -455,7 +446,8 @@ void pci_aer_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (dev->aer_cap)
>  		dev->aer_stats = kzalloc(sizeof(struct aer_stats), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> -	pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(dev);
> +	if (!pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
> +		pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(dev);

This effectively moves the "if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first())" check
from pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs() into one of the callers.  But
there are two other callers: pci_aer_init() and pci_restore_state().
Do they need the change, or do you want to cleanup the AER error
registers there, but not here?

>  }
>  
>  void pci_aer_exit(struct pci_dev *dev)
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>