[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191028232732.GA206631@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:27:32 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ashok.raj@...el.com, keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] PCI/DPC: Clear AER registers in EDR mode
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:39:03PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>
> As per PCI firmware specification r3.2 Downstream Port Containment
> Related Enhancements ECN,
Specific reference, please, e.g., the section/table/figure of the PCI
Firmware Spec being modified by the ECN.
> OS is responsible for clearing the AER
> registers in EDR mode. So clear AER registers in dpc_process_error()
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> index fafc55c00fe0..de2d892bc7c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,10 @@ static void dpc_process_error(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
> pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(pdev);
> }
>
> + /* In EDR mode, OS is responsible for clearing AER registers */
> + if (dpc->firmware_dpc)
I guess "EDR mode" is effectively the same as "firmware-first mode"?
At least, the only place we set "firmware_dpc = 1" is:
+ if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(pdev))
+ dpc->firmware_dpc = 1;
If they're the same, why do we need two different names for it?
> + pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(pdev);
> +
> /*
> * Irrespective of whether the DPC event is triggered by
> * ERR_FATAL or ERR_NONFATAL, since the link is already down,
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists