linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ec704df-97a5-04b7-1f20-8e3db19440a3@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:20:33 +0800
From:   Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <rth@...ddle.net>, <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
        <mattst88@...il.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        <paulus@...ba.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        <dalias@...c.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        <paul.burton@...s.com>, <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <anshuman.khandual@....com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <cai@....pw>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
        <len.brown@...el.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>, <dledford@...hat.com>,
        <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        <rafael@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
        <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware

On 2019/10/12 15:40, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:17:26PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> add pci and acpi maintainer
>> cc linux-pci@...r.kernel.org and linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> On 2019/10/11 19:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:27:54AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>>> But I failed to see why the above is related to making node_to_cpumask_map()
>>>> NUMA_NO_NODE aware?
>>>
>>> Your initial bug is for hns3, which is a PCI device, which really _MUST_
>>> have a node assigned.
>>>
>>> It not having one, is a straight up bug. We must not silently accept
>>> NO_NODE there, ever.
>>>
>>
>> I suppose you mean reporting a lack of affinity when the node of a pcie
>> device is not set by "not silently accept NO_NODE".
> 
> If the firmware of a pci device does not provide the node information,
> then yes, warn about that.
> 
>> As Greg has asked about in [1]:
>> what is a user to do when the user sees the kernel reporting that?
>>
>> We may tell user to contact their vendor for info or updates about
>> that when they do not know about their system well enough, but their
>> vendor may get away with this by quoting ACPI spec as the spec
>> considering this optional. Should the user believe this is indeed a
>> fw bug or a misreport from the kernel?
> 
> Say it is a firmware bug, if it is a firmware bug, that's simple.
> 
>> If this kind of reporting is common pratice and will not cause any
>> misunderstanding, then maybe we can report that.
> 
> Yes, please do so, that's the only way those boxes are ever going to get
> fixed.  And go add the test to the "firmware testing" tool that is based
> on Linux that Intel has somewhere, to give vendors a chance to fix this
> before they ship hardware.
> 
> This shouldn't be a big deal, we warn of other hardware bugs all the
> time.

Hi, all.

The warning for the above case has been added in [1].

So maybe it makes sense to make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware
now?

If Yes, this patch still can be applied to the latest linus' tree cleanly,
Do I need to resend it?


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1571467543-26125-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com/
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> .
>