| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3d504dd8-67be-de9b-86cf-61a8bee7b13d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 21:19:46 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per
block for stdio
On 10/29/2019 5:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:33:28AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>> It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the
>> sampled cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate
>> on the globally hottest blocks.
>>
>> This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts
>> all blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the
>> percent:
>>
>> percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles
>>
>> Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>> perf record -b ./div
>> perf report --total-cycles --stdio
>>
>> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
>> #
>> #
>> # Total Lost Samples: 0
>> #
>> # Samples: 2M of event 'cycles'
>> # Event count (approx.): 2753248
>> #
>> # Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
>> # ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................................. ....................
>> #
>> 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div
>> 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so
>> 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div
>> 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
>> 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div
>> 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div
>> 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so
>> 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
>> 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@...+0 -> rand@...+0] div
>> 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so
>> 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div
>> 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so
>> 0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so
>> 0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms]
>> 0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms]
>>
>> v4:
>> ---
>> 1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace
>> '-s total_cycles' in v3.
>>
>> 2. Move block info collection out of block info
>> printing.
>>
>> v3:
>> ---
>> 1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to
>> process the blocks per symbol.
>>
>> 2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation
>> of column length
>>
>> 3. Some minor cleanup
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 11 ++
>> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 22 ++++
>> tools/perf/util/hist.c | 4 +
>> tools/perf/util/symbol_conf.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
>> index 7315f155803f..8dbe2119686a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
>> @@ -525,6 +525,17 @@ include::itrace.txt[]
>> Configure time quantum for time sort key. Default 100ms.
>> Accepts s, us, ms, ns units.
>>
>> +--total-cycles::
>> + When --total-cycles is specified, it supports sorting for all blocks by
>> + 'Sampled Cycles%'. This is useful to concentrate on the globally hottest
>> + blocks. In output, there are some new columns:
>> +
>> + 'Sampled Cycles%' - block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles
>> + 'Sampled Cycles' - block sampled cycles aggregation
>> + 'Avg Cycles%' - block average sampled cycles / sum of total block average
>> + sampled cycles
>> + 'Avg Cycles' - block average sampled cycles
>> +
>> include::callchain-overhead-calculation.txt[]
>>
>> SEE ALSO
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> index cdb436d6e11f..a687d9e4aeca 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>> #include "util/util.h" // perf_tip()
>> #include "ui/ui.h"
>> #include "ui/progress.h"
>> +#include "util/block-info.h"
>>
>> #include <dlfcn.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> @@ -67,6 +68,12 @@
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <linux/mman.h>
>>
>> +struct block_report {
>> + struct block_hist block_hist;
>> + u64 block_cycles;
>> + struct block_fmt block_fmts[PERF_HPP_REPORT__BLOCK_MAX_INDEX];
>
> no need for the 'block_' prefix for the members
>
> also please put this and all the new functions under block_info.c
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
OK! I will remove the 'block_' prefix for the members in struct
block_report and move the related functions to block_info.c
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists