[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08921142-6e65-62e3-2a1c-9a78c7bc7d2e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 21:36:38 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per
block for stdio
On 10/29/2019 5:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:33:28AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> index 0e27d6830011..7cf137b0451b 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
>> @@ -758,6 +758,10 @@ struct hist_entry *hists__add_entry_block(struct hists *hists,
>> struct hist_entry entry = {
>> .block_info = block_info,
>> .hists = hists,
>> + .ms = {
>> + .map = al->map,
>> + .sym = al->sym,
>> + },
>
> this looks like separated fix, if thats the case
> please explain the change and move it to separate patch
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
Sorry, that should be the obsolete code. Thanks so much for pointing
this out.
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists