linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:17:51 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:     gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        joe.lawrence@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        nstange@...e.de, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing
 for the consistency model

Hi Miroslav,

> +bool unwind_next_frame_reliable(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
...
> +}
> +
>  void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
>  		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp,
>  		    bool unwind_reliable)

Did you send the wrong version of your patch series? This patch does
not integrate your new function into the existing one. Also the new
parameter you added with the second patch isn't used at all.