linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:05:45 +0100 (CET)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc:     gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        joe.lawrence@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        nstange@...e.de, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing
 for the consistency model

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> Hi Miroslav,
> 
> > +bool unwind_next_frame_reliable(struct unwind_state *state)
> > +{
> ...
> > +}
> > +
> >  void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
> >  		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long sp,
> >  		    bool unwind_reliable)
> 
> Did you send the wrong version of your patch series? This patch does
> not integrate your new function into the existing one. Also the new
> parameter you added with the second patch isn't used at all.

No, the version should be correct. Only __unwind_start_reliable() was 
integrated. The new parameter is used in arch_stack_walk_reliable() 
(unwind_reliable is set to true) and it is propagated to get_stack_info() 
where it is used to simplify things for the case.

Miroslav