linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: ftrace cleanup + FTRACE_WITH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191030170224.GB965@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:02:24 +0100
From:   Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        amit.kachhap@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, deller@....de,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, james.morse@....com,
        jeyu@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jthierry@...hat.com,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, svens@...ckframe.org,
        takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: ftrace cleanup + FTRACE_WITH_REGS


Whole series, on top of Linus' HEAD 320000e72ec0613e164ce9 (5.4.0-rc5)

[    0.418079] Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED
[    0.670416] Testing dynamic ftrace ops #1: 
[    0.751367] (1 0 1 0 0) 
[    0.751374] (1 1 2 0 0) 
[    0.857303] (2 1 3 0 281230) 
[    0.857327] (2 2 4 0 281332) PASSED
[    0.930124] Testing dynamic ftrace ops #2: 
[    1.110333] (1 0 1 281189 0) 
[    1.110360] (1 1 2 281329 0) 
[    1.110815] (2 1 3 1 2) 
[    1.110841] (2 2 4 113 114) PASSED
[    1.170653] Testing ftrace recursion: PASSED
[    1.192250] Testing ftrace recursion safe: PASSED
[    1.213819] Testing ftrace regs: PASSED
[    1.235397] Testing tracer nop: PASSED
[    1.235404] Testing tracer wakeup: PASSED
[    1.363921] Testing tracer wakeup_rt: PASSED
[    1.494283] Testing tracer wakeup_dl: PASSED
[    1.623948] Testing tracer function_graph: PASSED

# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU  DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
# |     |   |                     |   |   |   |
 0)               |  wake_up_process() {
 0)               |    try_to_wake_up() {
 0)               |      select_task_rq_fair() {
 0)               |        select_idle_sibling() {
 0)   3.360 us    |          available_idle_cpu();
 0) + 10.940 us   |        }
[...]

The graph tracer is the trickiest part to get working correctly, from my
experience. IOW: everything looks fine.

Whole series,
Tested-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@...e.de>

	Torsten