[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201910301139.ED3551BB14@keescook>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:40:56 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Jan Glauber <jglauber@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Rework REFCOUNT_FULL using atomic_fetch_*
operations
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:30:25PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is version four of the patches I previously posted here:
>
> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802101000.12958-1-will@kernel.org
> v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827163204.29903-1-will@kernel.org
> v3: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191007154703.5574-1-will@kernel.org
>
> Changes since v3 include:
>
> - Add description of racy behaviour include/linux/refcount.h
> - Fix saturation behaviour in refcount_sub_and_test()
> - Added Acks and Tested-bys
Thanks again for this! I think this series is in good shape; I'm glad we
can sanely expand these protections.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists