lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 08:08:48 -0700
From:   Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        matthewgarrett@...gle.com, sashal@...nel.org,
        jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key
 create or update

On 10/31/19 5:10 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 18:19 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> Asymmetric keys used for verifying file signatures or certificates
>> are currently not included in the IMA measurement list.
>>
>> This patch defines a new IMA hook namely ima_post_key_create_or_update()
>> to measure asymmetric keys.
> 
> It's not enough for the kernel to be able to compile the kernel after
> applying all the patches in a patch set.  After applying each patch,
> the kernel should build properly, otherwise it is not bi-sect safe.
>   Refer to "3) Separate your changes" of
> "Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

I started with kernel version 5.3 for this patch set.
I applied Nayna's process_buffer_measurement() patch and then built my 
changes on top of that.
This patch has no other dependency as far as I know.

Are you seeing a build break after applying this patch alone?

(PATCH v3 1/9) KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create 
or update
> 
> This patch should also define the new "func".
> 

Ok - I'll make that change.

thanks,
  -lakshmi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ