[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9GAmy5NXJisrDssspoRcc+UHum+cyBsJTMNTjz_jieoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:57:53 +0100
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, raven@...maw.net,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring,
not cursor and length [ver #2]
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:11 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> How about:
>
> * We use head and tail indices that aren't masked off, except at the
> * point of dereference, but rather they're allowed to wrap naturally.
> * This means there isn't a dead spot in the buffer, provided the ring
> * size is a power of two and <= 2^31.
To me "provided" reads like this thing works without a dead spot or
with a dead spot, depending on whether the condition is met. I would
say:
> * This means there isn't a dead spot in the buffer, but the ring
> * size has to be a power of two and <= 2^31.
Thanks,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists