[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191031155750.GA7394@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:57:50 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:53:13PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > +#define ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS 30
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
> > > * that occur (potentially in generic code) before arm64_memblock_init()
> > > @@ -424,6 +427,8 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> > > else
> > > arm64_dma_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
> > >
> > > + zone_dma_bits = ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS;
> > > +
> > > reserve_crashkernel();
> >
> > This actually adds a new limit, as there wasn't one before for arm64.
>
> Well, as zone_dma_bits is only relevant in dma/direct when ZONE_DMA is defined
> I figured it doesn't matter if the variable is set conditionally to ZONE_DMA or
> not.
I'd much prefer that to do separately.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists