lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:57:50 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma/direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:53:13PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > +#define ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS	30
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
> > >   * that occur (potentially in generic code) before arm64_memblock_init()
> > > @@ -424,6 +427,8 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> > >  	else
> > >  		arm64_dma_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
> > >  
> > > +	zone_dma_bits = ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS;
> > > +
> > >  	reserve_crashkernel();
> > 
> > This actually adds a new limit, as there wasn't one before for arm64.
> 
> Well, as zone_dma_bits is only relevant in dma/direct when ZONE_DMA is defined
> I figured it doesn't matter if the variable is set conditionally to ZONE_DMA or
> not.

I'd much prefer that to do separately.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ