lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVxCEAdxj4xfnU2DEr0UkL5-xNzVdUFkvFgpzr28a7Vfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 13:45:53 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Do not use platform_get_irq() to
 count interrupts

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:35 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:07 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:26 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> > > As platform_get_irq() now prints an error when the interrupt does not
> > > exist, counting interrupts by looping until failure causes the printing
> > > of scary messages like:
> > >
> > >     sh-pfc e6060000.pin-controller: IRQ index 0 not found
> > >
> > > Fix this by using the platform_irq_count() helper instead.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7723f4c5ecdb8d83 ("driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
> > > Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >   - Add Reviewed-by, Tested-by.
> > >
> > > Linus: Can you please take this one, as it is a fix for v5.4? Thx!
> >
> > I'm not sure the little error message counts as
> > a regression, certainly users can live with it.
>
> Several similar fixes have already made it upstream.
> But the decision is up to you.
>
> > Can't you just put it in your queue for the next kernel?
>
> Sure, will do (after ELC-E), if you prefer.

Queuing in sh-pfc-for-v5.5.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ