linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir from system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191101042337.GA3141@Gentoo>
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:53:40 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     bfields@...ldses.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir
 from system

On 08:06 Thu 31 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 10/31/19 12:18 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 22:27 Wed 30 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 10/30/19 9:52 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>>>>>> That 'rm' doesn't remove any files.  Compare what remove_old_kernel() does.
>>>>>> No,it is not using that function rather take the parameter from the
>>>>>> commandline and get into boot dir match with it and remove it.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it doesn't do that.  I tested it.  It should be more like what
>>>>> rmeove_old_kernel() does:
>>>>>
>>>>>         rm -If vmlinuz-$kernel_ver System.map-$kernel_ver config-$kernel_ver
>>>>>
>>>>> and if not, please explain why not.
>>>> Okay, again some uniformity missing in the code, I would like to your
>>>> suggested method,i.e call remove_old_kernel to do the job instead of depending on individual kernel.
>>>
>>> The simplest thing to do is set kernel_version=$kernel_ver
>>> and then call remove_old_kernel().
>>> And set modules_version=$modules_dir_name and call remove_old_modules_dir().
>>>
>>> But it would be cleaner to pass a parameter (kernel_version) to the
>>> remove_old_kernel() function and to pass a parameter (modules_dir) to the
>>> remove_old_modules_dir() function.
>> 
>>>
>> 
>> Thank you...I have just modified the code and call both the function
>> under remove option. BTW I didn't set the extra variable $kernel_ver name it $kernel_version and instead of $modules_dir_name name it $mo
>> dules_version.
>> 
>> Capturing command line parameter in $kernel_version and $modules_version
>> 
>> Is that fine? Here is a code snippet:
>
>Yes, that should be OK.
>
>> -r | --remove)
>>   if [[ $# -ne 3 ]]; then
>>    printf "You need to provide kernel version and modules directory
>>    name \n"
>>    exit 1
>>    else
>>    remove_old_kernel
>>    remove_old_modules_dir
>>    fi
>> 
>> 
>> I have just test it and it works.
>> 
>> 
>> And about solitary r option without hypen is ignoring and doing nothing.
>> 
>> Means, if I pass ./scripts/prune-kernel r 5.3.3
>> it simply ignore and does nothing.Only with the hypen it can work.
>
>Is that how it should be?
>or what would you expect that to do?
Yes it should be. Any malformed parameter should be discarded,except
what explicitly given in code form,as help reminder.
OR
Do you want me to reminds user that they are missing thing to operate
correctly?? 

>
>-- 
>~Randy
Bhaskar
>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)