lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 10:41:11 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     bfields@...ldses.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir
 from system

On 09:53 Fri 01 Nov 2019, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>On 08:06 Thu 31 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>On 10/31/19 12:18 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>> On 22:27 Wed 30 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 10/30/19 9:52 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>>>>>>> That 'rm' doesn't remove any files.  Compare what remove_old_kernel() does.
>>>>>>> No,it is not using that function rather take the parameter from the
>>>>>>> commandline and get into boot dir match with it and remove it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it doesn't do that.  I tested it.  It should be more like what
>>>>>> rmeove_old_kernel() does:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         rm -If vmlinuz-$kernel_ver System.map-$kernel_ver config-$kernel_ver
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and if not, please explain why not.
>>>>> Okay, again some uniformity missing in the code, I would like to your
>>>>> suggested method,i.e call remove_old_kernel to do the job instead of depending on individual kernel.
>>>>
>>>> The simplest thing to do is set kernel_version=$kernel_ver
>>>> and then call remove_old_kernel().
>>>> And set modules_version=$modules_dir_name and call remove_old_modules_dir().
>>>>
>>>> But it would be cleaner to pass a parameter (kernel_version) to the
>>>> remove_old_kernel() function and to pass a parameter (modules_dir) to the
>>>> remove_old_modules_dir() function.
>>> 
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Thank you...I have just modified the code and call both the function
>>> under remove option. BTW I didn't set the extra variable $kernel_ver name it $kernel_version and instead of $modules_dir_name name it $mo
>>> dules_version.
>>> 
>>> Capturing command line parameter in $kernel_version and $modules_version
>>> 
>>> Is that fine? Here is a code snippet:
>>
>>Yes, that should be OK.
>>
>>> -r | --remove)
>>>   if [[ $# -ne 3 ]]; then
>>>    printf "You need to provide kernel version and modules directory
>>>    name \n"
>>>    exit 1
>>>    else
>>>    remove_old_kernel
>>>    remove_old_modules_dir
>>>    fi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have just test it and it works.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And about solitary r option without hypen is ignoring and doing nothing.
>>> 
>>> Means, if I pass ./scripts/prune-kernel r 5.3.3
>>> it simply ignore and does nothing.Only with the hypen it can work.
>>
>>Is that how it should be?
>>or what would you expect that to do?
>Yes it should be. Any malformed parameter should be discarded,except
>what explicitly given in code form,as help reminder.
>OR
>Do you want me to reminds user that they are missing thing to operate
>correctly?? 
>
>>
>>-- 
>>~Randy
>Bhaskar
>>
Randy,

I think we should show the help message , whenever user put a malformed
parameter, say they put something like this :

./scripts/prune-kernel f 5.3.3

It should show the help message to indicate what exactly need to pass
with the script to get the desired result.

What do you think??

~Bhaskar

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEnwF+nWawchZUPOuwsjqdtxFLKRUFAl27s0EACgkQsjqdtxFL
>KRV81wf/cMmIASLvGNbAxdbZY/7xnsdsaOWLsfH5c4twHsVwm74Zbasdq8s1l5Kn
>z8CZeWxKOKsItEY52g2vXbyDMFkk2La77kHZo4O5hQOmenRMaD9M7wcWqSCOJg59
>EbhMUt7RLpJLDKYTtegoGIyNgVZXfV8PpH6iKIvNscyJPMNBvppgRKkn80MWoG7k
>i0rMI6kvchwilxhVz/LPbJgKrIayhriKIBfTbDracSdX+WtJMQbAjdWRgGk0rmGe
>wS0p8nwJmmqXSc/qrrgZPR9VxsknVNMm/PzKS9CTE+GvELjXS8MeG3iwauQ4hx2K
>B255AW+zobp0IQGwTqH7VwO0u2GzLQ==
>=3y5/
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ