[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f272bdd3-526d-6737-c906-143d5e5fc478@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 21:38:50 +0200
From: Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow restricting permissions in /proc/sys
On 3.11.2019 20.50, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com> writes:
>
>> Several items in /proc/sys need not be accessible to unprivileged
>> tasks. Let the system administrator change the permissions, but only
>> to more restrictive modes than what the sysctl tables allow.
>
> This looks quite buggy. You neither update table->mode nor
> do you ever read from table->mode to initialize the inode.
> I am missing something in my quick reading of your patch?
inode->i_mode gets initialized in proc_sys_make_inode().
I didn't want to touch the table, so that the original permissions can
be used to restrict the changes made. In case the restrictions are
removed as suggested by Theodore Ts'o, table->mode could be changed.
Otherwise I'd rather add a new field to store the current mode and the
mode field can remain for reference. As the original author of the code
from 2007, would you let the administrator to chmod/chown the items in
/proc/sys without restrictions (e.g. 0400 -> 0777)?
> The not updating table->mode almost certainly means that as soon as the
> cached inode is invalidated the mode changes will disappear. Not to
> mention they will fail to propogate between different instances of
> proc.
>
> Loosing all of your changes at cache invalidation seems to make this a
> useless feature.
At least different proc instances seem to work just fine here (they show
the same changes), but I suppose you are right about cache invalidation.
-Topi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists