linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pdc interrupt controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6610d7fe-5a4d-5a43-5c4f-9ae61e7e53ee@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:47:19 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pdc interrupt
 controller



On 10/31/2019 1:20 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:50:40AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-10-23 02:02:19)
>>> From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
>>>
>>> Add pdc interrupt controller for sc7180
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> v3:
>>> Used the qcom,sdm845-pdc compatible for pdc node
>>
>> Everything else isn't doing the weird old compatible thing. Why not just
>> add the new compatible and update the driver? I guess I'll have to go
>> read the history.
> 
> Marc Zyngier complained  on v2 about the churn from adding compatible
> strings for identical components, and I kinda see his point.
> 
> I agree that using the 'sdm845' compatible string for sc7180 is odd too.
> Maybe we should introduce SoC independent compatible strings for IP blocks
> that are shared across multiple SoCs? If differentiation is needed SoC
> specific strings can be added.

Sure, I will perhaps add a qcom,pdc SoC independent compatible to avoid
confusion.


-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation