[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANSCoS_MX97_JyLkKrZ7YjTS9L+JsZcPsHpoZ-keA8t3W394Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:01:52 -0800
From: Charles Machalow <csm10495@...il.com>
To: Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-nvme <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
kbusch <kbusch@...nel.org>, axboe <axboe@...com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: change nvme_passthru_cmd64's result field.
Yes. The idea is just to change the 64 IOCTL structure so it lines up
with the old ones so that the same struct can be used from userspace.
Right now the first 32 of 64's result doesn't line up with the old
result field.
- Charlie Scott Machalow
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 6:56 AM Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- On 4 Nov, 2019, at 15:51, Charles Machalow csm10495@...il.com wrote:
>
> > For this one yes, UAPI size changes. Though I believe this IOCTL
> > hasn't been in a released Kernel yet (just RC). Technically it may be
> > changeable as a fix until the next Kernel is released. I do think its
> > a useful enough
> > change to warrant a late fix.
>
> The old one is in UAPI for years. The new one is not yet, right. I'm OK
> to change the new structure. To have compatibility you would have to use
> the new structure (at least its size) in the user space code. This is
> what you'd liek to do?
>
> Marta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists