lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:13:07 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: bd70528: Fix hour register mask

Hello Alexandre,

I'd expect the BD71828 support to still take a while. I don't expect it
to land in next kernel release. I'd prefer getting this fix in now (and
I hope it might also get merged to earlier releases by the 'fixes'
tag). So if it's not a problem for you then please apply this fix now -
I can rebase the BD71828 support when this fix is out :)

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 17:57 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 05/11/2019 17:53:18+0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 23/10/2019 14:47:51+0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > When RTC is used in 24H mode (and it is by this driver) the
> > > maximum
> > > hour value is 24 in BCD. This occupies bits [5:0] - which means
> > > correct mask for HOUR register is 0x3f not 0x1f. Fix the mask
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 32a4a4ebf768 ("rtc: bd70528: Initial support for ROHM
> > > bd70528 RTC")
> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com
> > > >
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd70528.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> 
> Actually, is there any point in doing that since "rtc: bd70528 add
> BD71828 support" will conflict with it and correct the issue anyway?
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ