[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191105080614.GB2611856@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:06:14 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@....com>, chrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>,
mmarhefk@...hat.com, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, maheshb@...gle.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: stable-rc-5.3.9-rc1: regressions detected - remove_proc_entry:
removing non-empty directory 'net/dev_snmp6', leaking at least 'lo'
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:28:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 13:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > Linux stable rc 5.3 branch running LTP reported following test failures.
> > > > While investigating these failures I have found this kernel warning
> > > > from boot console.
> > > > Please find detailed LTP output log in the bottom of this email.
> > > >
> > > > List of regression test cases:
> > > > ltp-containers-tests:
> > > > * netns_breakns_ip_ipv6_ioctl
> <trim>
> > > > * netns_comm_ns_exec_ipv6_netlink
> > >
> > > These reported failures got fixed on latest stable-rc 5.3.y after
> > > dropping a patch [1].
> >
> > What is the subject of the patch?
>
> blackhole_netdev: fix syzkaller reported issue
> upstream commit b0818f80c8c1bc215bba276bd61c216014fab23b
That commit is not in any stable queue or tree at the moment, are you
sure this is still an issue?
> > > The kernel warning is also gone now.
> > >
> > > metadata:
> > > git branch: linux-5.3.y
> > > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > > git commit: 75c9913bbf6e9e64cb669236571e6af45cddfd68
> >
> > The -rc tree is rebased all the time, can I get a "real" subject line to
> > get a chance to figure out what you are trying to refer to here?
>
> Linux 5.3.9-rc1 is good candidate on branch linux-5.3.y and
> linux-stable-rc tree.
I can not parse this, what do you mean?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists