linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: RCU: whatisRCU: Fix formatting for section 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc5570d4-26bf-59ab-76bb-79490dde2369@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:52:59 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org, Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
Cc:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: RCU: whatisRCU: Fix formatting for section
 2

Hi Amol,

On 11/4/19 12:45 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:46:41PM +0530, Amol Grover wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:03:28AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:03:15PM +0530, Amol Grover wrote:
>>>> Convert RCU API method text to sub-headings and
>>>> add hyperlink and superscript to 2 literary notes
>>>> under rcu_dereference() section
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Good stuff, but Phong Tran beat you to it.  If you are suggesting
>>> changes to that patch, please send a reply to her email, which
>>> may be found here:
>>>

Please do a review and send comments and suggestions in an email
instead of a patch.

>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191030233128.14997-1-tranmanphong@gmail.com/
>>>
>>> There are several options for replying to this email listed at the
>>> bottom of that web page.
>>
>> Thank you Paul! And that is correct, I was suggesting changes to
>> that patch. However, since that patch was already integrated into
>> the `dev` branch, I mistakenly believed this patch could be sent
>> independently. Sorry for the trouble, I'll re-send the patch the
>> correct way.
> 

Please drop your patch and do a review for the patch as suggested by
Paul. This should have been a review and not a patch on top.

thanks,
-- Shuah