[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911051550350.17054@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:53:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>, Shawn Landden <shawn@....icu>,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] futex: extend set_robust_list to allow 2 locking
ABIs at the same time.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
> > "Robust mutexes do not take ROBUST_LIST_LIMIT into account"
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19089
>
> That's just a missing check in our implementation and something that few
> applications will encounter, if any. There is this one here:
>
> <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19004>
>
> It contains a kernel patch.
>
> I thought that there were more issues in the current implementation, but
> I can't a record of them. 8-(
There is a nasty one in my inbox with a kernel patch fixing it, which I
still need to review with all futex brain cells activated:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1572573789-16557-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists