[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191106094138.62qkvhfpyf5brits@ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:41:38 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Pascal Bouwmann <bouwmann@...-tec.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 059/149] iio: fix center temperature of
bmc150-accel-core
> From: Pascal Bouwmann <bouwmann@...-tec.de>
>
> [ Upstream commit 6c59a962e081df6d8fe43325bbfabec57e0d4751 ]
>
> The center temperature of the supported devices stored in the constant
> BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL is not 24 degrees but 23 degrees.
>
> It seems that some datasheets were inconsistent on this value leading
> to the error. For most usecases will only make minor difference so
> not queued for stable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pascal Bouwmann <bouwmann@...-tec.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Minor miscalibration, and author specifically states it should not be
queued for stable. Yet, Sasha goes and queues it for stable. Why?
Pavel
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
> #define BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_1_SEC 0x0F
>
> #define BMC150_ACCEL_REG_TEMP 0x08
> -#define BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL 24
> +#define BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL 23
>
> #define BMC150_ACCEL_AXIS_TO_REG(axis) (BMC150_ACCEL_REG_XOUT_L + (axis * 2))
> #define BMC150_AUTO_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS 2000
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists