linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] perf/core: fix unlock balance in perf_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <BFC92F0C-22D3-4543-9FAE-D53C7383CB3F@lca.pw>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 05:37:34 -0500
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org, acme@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] perf/core: fix unlock balance in perf_init_event



> On Nov 6, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> You wanted to write:
> 
> Fixes: 66d258c5b048 ("perf/core: Optimize perf_init_event()")
> 
> instead, right? Fixed that for you.

I was not too sure about if the hashes are stable for commits only in the -tip tree. If they remain the same even after merged into the mainline, and then yes.