linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] perf/core: fix unlock balance in perf_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191106110632.GW4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:06:32 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org, acme@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] perf/core: fix unlock balance in perf_init_event

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:37:34AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Nov 6, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > You wanted to write:
> > 
> > Fixes: 66d258c5b048 ("perf/core: Optimize perf_init_event()")
> > 
> > instead, right? Fixed that for you.
> 
> I was not too sure about if the hashes are stable for commits only in
> the -tip tree. If they remain the same even after merged into the
> mainline, and then yes.

-tip commits are generally stable.