linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191106135340.3fa45898@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:53:40 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:14:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> I added the following merge fix patch for today:
> 

This patch is now just:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:08:43 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: update for mutex_release API change

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c    | 2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index aa37c07004b9..a47387174434 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ void i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
 	mutex_acquire(&ref->mutex.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
 	if (!__i915_active_fence_set(&ref->excl, f))
 		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
-	mutex_release(&ref->mutex.dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_);
+	mutex_release(&ref->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
 }
 
 bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref)
-- 
2.23.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped