linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82d17114302562e0c553e2ea936974f77734e86b.camel@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 06 Nov 2019 16:07:39 +0100
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion
 to YAML

Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> wrote:
> > Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading
> > to
> > one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard.
> > 
> > This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections
> > and
> > will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles.
> 
> That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up...
> 
> This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
> branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
> apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and
> we
> finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus'
> tree).

This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is
not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your
tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit -
I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :)

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)