linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLDFefWVdiPuAktctuBpBeOvG-OVhX2aZn=UaiN55nodg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:34:12 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:07 AM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:40 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> > wrote:
> > > Instead of grouping alphabetically by third-party vendor, leading
> > > to
> > > one-element enums, sort by Mali model number, as done for Utgard.
> > >
> > > This already allows us to de-duplicate two "arm,mali-t760" sections
> > > and
> > > will make it easier to add new vendor compatibles.
> >
> > That was the intent. Not sure how I messed that up...
> >
> > This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
> > branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
> > apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and
> > we
> > finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus'
> > tree).
>
> This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is
> not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your
> tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit -
> I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :)

I was assuming the non-RFC patches are good to go, so I was going to
pick up 1, 2, and 7.

Rob