linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:03:26 +0100
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-midgard: Tidy up conversion to
 YAML

Am 06.11.19 um 16:34 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:07 AM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2019, 08:24 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring:
>>> This patch is problematic because there's changes in arm-soc juno/dt
>>> branch and there's now a patch for exynos5420 (t628). I'd propose I
>>> apply this such that we don't get a merge conflict with juno/dt and
>>> we
>>> finish resorting after rc1 (or when both branches are in Linus'
>>> tree).
>>
>> This series has dependencies for the Realtek-side RFC patches and is
>> not yet ready to merge, so you can take this prep PATCH through your
>> tree for v5.6 probably, or feel free to rebase/rework as you see fit -
>> I'd just appreciate being credited at least via Reported-by. :)
> 
> I was assuming the non-RFC patches are good to go, so I was going to
> pick up 1, 2, and 7.

Actually 1, 2 and 4 should be good to go; 7 if you fix the subject or if
I respin. Also 6 if you can have someone check that no new properties
will be needed for 470 (no Linux driver support yet).

All but 1 assuming you'll be okay to add SoC-specific restrictions on
clocks/resets/domains later, once we've fully figured it out (cf. cover
letter for current errors - looking into power domains next).

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)