[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191106030542.868541-23-dima@arista.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 03:05:13 +0000
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 22/50] nds32: Add show_stack_loglvl()
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
---
arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c b/arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c
index 40625760a125..90f12582c218 100644
--- a/arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c
@@ -97,18 +97,19 @@ static void dump_instr(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
#define LOOP_TIMES (100)
-static void __dump(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *base_reg)
+static void __dump(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *base_reg,
+ const char *loglvl)
{
unsigned long ret_addr;
int cnt = LOOP_TIMES, graph = 0;
- pr_emerg("Call Trace:\n");
+ printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)) {
while (!kstack_end(base_reg)) {
ret_addr = *base_reg++;
if (__kernel_text_address(ret_addr)) {
ret_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(
tsk, &graph, ret_addr, NULL);
- print_ip_sym(KERN_EMERG, ret_addr);
+ print_ip_sym(loglvl, ret_addr);
}
if (--cnt < 0)
break;
@@ -124,17 +125,18 @@ static void __dump(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *base_reg)
ret_addr = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(
tsk, &graph, ret_addr, NULL);
- print_ip_sym(KERN_EMERG, ret_addr);
+ print_ip_sym(loglvl, ret_addr);
}
if (--cnt < 0)
break;
base_reg = (unsigned long *)next_fp;
}
}
- pr_emerg("\n");
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
}
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp,
+ const char *loglvl)
{
unsigned long *base_reg;
@@ -151,10 +153,15 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
else
__asm__ __volatile__("\tori\t%0, $fp, #0\n":"=r"(base_reg));
}
- __dump(tsk, base_reg);
+ __dump(tsk, base_reg, loglvl);
barrier();
}
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
+{
+ show_stack_loglvl(tsk, sp, KERN_EMERG);
+}
+
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(die_lock);
/*
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists