[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191107211801.GA107543@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:18:01 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>,
Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the arm-soc tree
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:27:20AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:46 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 68e36a429ef5 ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: Move thermal-zone out of SoC")
> >
> > from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> >
> > 8d49ebe713ab ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add PCIe controller DT nodes")
>
> Bjorn, we ask that driver subsystem maintainers don't pick up DT
> changes since it causes conflicts like these.
>
> Is it easy for you to drop this patch, or are we stuck with it?
> Ideally it should never have been sent to you in the first place. :(
Lorenzo, is it feasible for you to drop it from your pci/layerscape
branch and repush it? If so, I can redo the merge into my "next"
branch.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists