linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add support for RPMHCC for SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191107211959.5BB7F20869@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:19:58 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add support for RPMHCC for SC7180

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2019-11-07 13:13:53)
> Quoting Taniya Das (2019-10-29 10:48:19)
> > Add support for clock RPMh driver to vote for ARC and VRM managed
> > clock resources.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > index 20d4258..3f3e08b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > @@ -391,6 +391,24 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8150 = {
> >         .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8150_rpmh_clocks),
> >  };
> > 
> > +static struct clk_hw *sc7180_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> 
> I don't think we need to duplicate this array either, unless somehow
> this driver is running on two different SoCs which seems highly
> unlikely.
> 

Ah but we don't have IPA clk or RF_CLK3 on sc7180. Alright this can be
revisited later.