[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c15e61f739045ee876ae3fbb1e49446@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:20:57 +0000
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
"mehta.salil@...src.net" <mehta.salil@...src.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: hns: Fix the stray netpoll locks causing
deadlock in NAPI path
Hi Marc,
> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@...nel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 2:13 PM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
>
> Hi Salil,
>
> On 2019-11-06 20:03, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > This patch fixes the problem of the spin locks, originally
> > meant for the netpoll path of hns driver, causing deadlock in
> > the normal NAPI poll path. The issue happened due presence of
> > the stray leftover spin lock code related to the netpoll,
> > whose support was earlier removed from the HNS[1], got activated
> > due to enabling of NET_POLL_CONTROLLER switch.
> >
> > Earlier background:
> > The netpoll handling code originally had this bug(as identified
> > by Marc Zyngier[2]) of wrong spin lock API being used which did
> > not disable the interrupts and hence could cause locking issues.
> > i.e. if the lock were first acquired in context to thread like
> > 'ip' util and this lock if ever got later acquired again in
> > context to the interrupt context like TX/RX (Interrupts could
> > always pre-empt the lock holding task and acquire the lock again)
> > and hence could cause deadlock.
> >
> > Proposed Solution:
> > 1. If the netpoll was enabled in the HNS driver, which is not
> > right now, we could have simply used spin_[un]lock_irqsave()
> > 2. But as netpoll is disabled, therefore, it is best to get rid
> > of the existing locks and stray code for now. This should
> > solve the problem reported by Marc.
> >
> > @Marc,
> > Could you please test this patch and confirm if the problem is
> > fixed at your end?
>
> Yes, this fixes it, although you may want to fully get rid of
> the now useless lock:
Oops..missed them. I will fix these as well and float V2 version
of this patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.c
> index 6d0457eb4faa..08339278c722 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ hnae_init_ring(struct hnae_queue *q, struct
> hnae_ring *ring, int flags)
>
> ring->q = q;
> ring->flags = flags;
> - spin_lock_init(&ring->lock);
> ring->coal_param = q->handle->coal_param;
> assert(!ring->desc && !ring->desc_cb && !ring->desc_dma_addr);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.h
> index e9c67c06bfd2..6ab9458302e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hnae.h
> @@ -274,9 +274,6 @@ struct hnae_ring {
> /* statistic */
> struct ring_stats stats;
>
> - /* ring lock for poll one */
> - spinlock_t lock;
> -
> dma_addr_t desc_dma_addr;
> u32 buf_size; /* size for hnae_desc->addr, preset by AE */
> u16 desc_num; /* total number of desc */
>
> With that:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Many thanks for your review and testing.
Best Regards
Salil.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists