linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] interconnect changes for 5.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191107142111.GB109902@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:21:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] interconnect changes for 5.5

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:46:53PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> This is a pull request with interconnect patches for the 5.5 merge window.
> All patches have been for a while in linux-next without reported issues. The
> details are in the signed tag. Please consider pulling into char-misc-next.

I don't know about
0003-interconnect-Disallow-interconnect-core-to-be-built-.patch here.
Shouldn't you just fix up the dependancies of subsystems that rely on
this?  We are moving more and more to kernels that "just work" with
everything as modules, even on arm64 systems.  So forbiding the
interconnect code from being able to be built as a module does not feel
good to me at all.

Same for
0007-interconnect-Remove-unused-module-exit-code-from-cor.patch, we are
adding module_init/exit() calls to modules, do not remove them!

Can you drop those two patches and resend?  Or I can just take these out
of the pull request and apply the rest as patches for now, if that's
easier for you to handle.

thanks,

greg k-h