lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26822f67-1cd7-eeda-2caa-2bc7d420f173@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:27:46 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc:     Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        drbd-dev@...n.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in
 __drbd_send_protocol()

On 11/8/19 9:26 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/6/19 11:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
>> this ends up being a double unlock.
> 
> Is there a typo in the patch subject (stay -> stray)?

I fixed that up while applying, fwiw.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ