[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191108131909.428842459@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:15:54 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qperret@...gle.com,
valentin.schneider@....com, qais.yousef@....com,
ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] sched: Fix pick_next_task() vs change pattern race
Commit 67692435c411 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
inadvertly introduced a race because it changed a previously
unexplored dependency between dropping the rq->lock and
sched_class::put_prev_task().
The comments about dropping rq->lock, in for example
newidle_balance(), only mentions the task being current and ->on_cpu
being set. But when we look at the 'change' pattern (in for example
sched_setnuma()):
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); /* p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED */
running = task_current(rq, p); /* rq->curr == p */
if (queued)
dequeue_task(...);
if (running)
put_prev_task(...);
/* change task properties */
if (queued)
enqueue_task(...);
if (running)
set_next_task(...);
It becomes obvious that if we do this after put_prev_task() has
already been called on @p, things go sideways. This is exactly what
the commit in question allows to happen when it does:
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
if (!rq->nr_running)
newidle_balance(rq, rf);
The newidle_balance() call will drop rq->lock after we've called
put_prev_task() and that allows the above 'change' pattern to
interleave and mess up the state.
Furthermore, it turns out we lost the RT-pull when we put the last DL
task.
Fix both problems by extracting the balancing from put_prev_task() and
doing a multi-class balance() pass before put_prev_task().
Fixes: 67692435c411 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
kernel/sched/idle.c | 9 ++++++++-
kernel/sched/rt.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
7 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3929,13 +3929,22 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
}
restart:
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
- * Ensure that we put DL/RT tasks before the pick loop, such that they
- * can PULL higher prio tasks when we lower the RQ 'priority'.
+ * We must do the balancing pass before put_next_task(), such
+ * that when we release the rq->lock the task is in the same
+ * state as before we took rq->lock.
+ *
+ * We can terminate the balance pass as soon as we know there is
+ * a runnable task of @class priority or higher.
*/
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
- if (!rq->nr_running)
- newidle_balance(rq, rf);
+ for_class_range(class, prev->sched_class, &idle_sched_class) {
+ if (class->balance(rq, prev, rf))
+ break;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ put_prev_task(rq, prev);
for_each_class(class) {
p = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
@@ -6201,7 +6210,7 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_migrat
for_each_class(class) {
next = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
if (next) {
- next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next, NULL);
+ next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);
return next;
}
}
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1691,6 +1691,22 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struc
resched_curr(rq);
}
+static int balance_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ if (!on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
+ /*
+ * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
+ * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
+ * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
+ * not yet started the picking loop.
+ */
+ rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+ pull_dl_task(rq);
+ rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+ }
+
+ return sched_stop_runnable(rq) || sched_dl_runnable(rq);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/*
@@ -1758,45 +1774,28 @@ static struct task_struct *
pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
+ struct dl_rq *dl_rq = &rq->dl;
struct task_struct *p;
- struct dl_rq *dl_rq;
WARN_ON_ONCE(prev || rf);
- dl_rq = &rq->dl;
-
- if (unlikely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
+ if (!sched_dl_runnable(rq))
return NULL;
dl_se = pick_next_dl_entity(rq, dl_rq);
BUG_ON(!dl_se);
-
p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
-
set_next_task_dl(rq, p);
-
return p;
}
-static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
update_curr_dl(rq);
update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
-
- if (rf && !on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
- /*
- * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
- * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
- * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
- * not yet started the picking loop.
- */
- rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
- pull_dl_task(rq);
- rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
- }
}
/*
@@ -2442,6 +2441,7 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class
.set_next_task = set_next_task_dl,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .balance = balance_dl,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_dl,
.migrate_task_rq = migrate_task_rq_dl,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_dl,
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6423,6 +6423,15 @@ static void task_dead_fair(struct task_s
{
remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
}
+
+static int
+balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ if (rq->nr_running)
+ return 1;
+
+ return newidle_balance(rq, rf) != 0;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -6599,7 +6608,7 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struc
int new_tasks;
again:
- if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
+ if (!sched_fair_runnable(rq))
goto idle;
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -6737,7 +6746,7 @@ done: __maybe_unused;
/*
* Account for a descheduled task:
*/
-static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct sched_entity *se = &prev->se;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
@@ -10597,11 +10606,11 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_clas
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_fair,
-
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
.set_next_task = set_next_task_fair,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .balance = balance_fair,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
.migrate_task_rq = migrate_task_rq_fair,
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -365,6 +365,12 @@ select_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *
{
return task_cpu(p); /* IDLE tasks as never migrated */
}
+
+static int
+balance_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ return WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -375,7 +381,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(stru
resched_curr(rq);
}
-static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
}
@@ -460,6 +466,7 @@ const struct sched_class idle_sched_clas
.set_next_task = set_next_task_idle,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .balance = balance_idle,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_common,
#endif
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1469,6 +1469,22 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_prio(str
resched_curr(rq);
}
+static int balance_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ if (!on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
+ /*
+ * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
+ * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
+ * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
+ * not yet started the picking loop.
+ */
+ rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+ pull_rt_task(rq);
+ rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+ }
+
+ return sched_stop_runnable(rq) || sched_dl_runnable(rq) || sched_rt_runnable(rq);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/*
@@ -1552,21 +1568,18 @@ static struct task_struct *
pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
struct task_struct *p;
- struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
WARN_ON_ONCE(prev || rf);
- if (!rt_rq->rt_queued)
+ if (!sched_rt_runnable(rq))
return NULL;
p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
-
set_next_task_rt(rq, p);
-
return p;
}
-static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
update_curr_rt(rq);
@@ -1578,18 +1591,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *
*/
if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
-
- if (rf && !on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
- /*
- * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
- * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
- * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've
- * not yet started the picking loop.
- */
- rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
- pull_rt_task(rq);
- rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
- }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -2366,8 +2367,8 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class
.set_next_task = set_next_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .balance = balance_rt,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
-
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_common,
.rq_online = rq_online_rt,
.rq_offline = rq_offline_rt,
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1727,10 +1727,11 @@ struct sched_class {
struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq,
struct task_struct *prev,
struct rq_flags *rf);
- void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf);
+ void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int task_cpu, int sd_flag, int flags);
void (*migrate_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu);
@@ -1773,7 +1774,7 @@ struct sched_class {
static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != prev);
- prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, NULL);
+ prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
}
static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
@@ -1787,8 +1788,12 @@ static inline void set_next_task(struct
#else
#define sched_class_highest (&dl_sched_class)
#endif
+
+#define for_class_range(class, _from, _to) \
+ for (class = (_from); class != (_to); class = class->next)
+
#define for_each_class(class) \
- for (class = sched_class_highest; class; class = class->next)
+ for_class_range(class, sched_class_highest, NULL)
extern const struct sched_class stop_sched_class;
extern const struct sched_class dl_sched_class;
@@ -1796,6 +1801,25 @@ extern const struct sched_class rt_sched
extern const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
extern const struct sched_class idle_sched_class;
+static inline bool sched_stop_runnable(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop);
+}
+
+static inline bool sched_dl_runnable(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return rq->dl.dl_nr_running > 0;
+}
+
+static inline bool sched_rt_runnable(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return rq->rt.rt_queued > 0;
+}
+
+static inline bool sched_fair_runnable(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return rq->cfs.nr_running > 0;
+}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ select_task_rq_stop(struct task_struct *
{
return task_cpu(p); /* stop tasks as never migrate */
}
+
+static int
+balance_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ return sched_stop_runnable(rq);
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void
@@ -31,16 +37,13 @@ static void set_next_task_stop(struct rq
static struct task_struct *
pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
- struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(prev || rf);
- if (!stop || !task_on_rq_queued(stop))
+ if (!sched_stop_runnable(rq))
return NULL;
- set_next_task_stop(rq, stop);
-
- return stop;
+ set_next_task_stop(rq, rq->stop);
+ return rq->stop;
}
static void
@@ -60,7 +63,7 @@ static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *r
BUG(); /* the stop task should never yield, its pointless. */
}
-static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
u64 delta_exec;
@@ -129,6 +132,7 @@ const struct sched_class stop_sched_clas
.set_next_task = set_next_task_stop,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .balance = balance_stop,
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_stop,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_common,
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists