linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/7] sched: Further clarify sched_class::set_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191108131909.775434698@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:16:00 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qperret@...gle.com,
        valentin.schneider@....com, qais.yousef@....com,
        ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] sched: Further clarify sched_class::set_next_task()

It turns out there really is something special to the first
set_next_task() invocation. In specific the 'change' pattern really
should not cause balance_callbacks.

Fixes: f95d4eaee6d0 ("sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c  |    7 +++++--
 kernel/sched/fair.c      |    2 +-
 kernel/sched/idle.c      |    4 ++--
 kernel/sched/rt.c        |    7 +++++--
 kernel/sched/sched.h     |    4 ++--
 kernel/sched/stop_task.c |    4 ++--
 6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1743,13 +1743,16 @@ static void start_hrtick_dl(struct rq *r
 }
 #endif
 
-static void set_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void set_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 {
 	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
 
 	/* You can't push away the running task */
 	dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
 
+	if (!first)
+		return;
+
 	if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
 		start_hrtick_dl(rq, p);
 
@@ -1782,7 +1785,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
 	dl_se = pick_next_dl_entity(rq, dl_rq);
 	BUG_ON(!dl_se);
 	p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
-	set_next_task_dl(rq, p);
+	set_next_task_dl(rq, p, true);
 	return p;
 }
 
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10343,7 +10343,7 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *
  * This routine is mostly called to set cfs_rq->curr field when a task
  * migrates between groups/classes.
  */
-static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 {
 	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq
 {
 }
 
-static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
+static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool first)
 {
 	update_idle_core(rq);
 	schedstat_inc(rq->sched_goidle);
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_idle(
 {
 	struct task_struct *next = rq->idle;
 
-	set_next_task_idle(rq, next);
+	set_next_task_idle(rq, next, true);
 
 	return next;
 }
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1515,13 +1515,16 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void set_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void set_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 {
 	p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
 
 	/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
 	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
 
+	if (!first)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * If prev task was rt, put_prev_task() has already updated the
 	 * utilization. We only care of the case where we start to schedule a
@@ -1572,7 +1575,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
 		return NULL;
 
 	p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
-	set_next_task_rt(rq, p);
+	set_next_task_rt(rq, p, true);
 	return p;
 }
 
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ struct sched_class {
 	struct task_struct *(*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq);
 
 	void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
-	void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
+	void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static inline void put_prev_task(struct
 static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != next);
-	next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next);
+	next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next, false);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, s
 	/* we're never preempted */
 }
 
-static void set_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *stop)
+static void set_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *stop, bool first)
 {
 	stop->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
 }
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
 	if (!sched_stop_runnable(rq))
 		return NULL;
 
-	set_next_task_stop(rq, rq->stop);
+	set_next_task_stop(rq, rq->stop, true);
 	return rq->stop;
 }