[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191109024754.GA573472@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 18:47:54 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@...ilicon.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
huangdaode <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
linyunsheng <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION]perf stat: comment of miss ratio
> Relevant code is checked to make sure that the ratio is calculated by
>
> L1-dcache-load-misses/L1-dcache-loads, data "7.58%=30249/399189*100%" also
>
> proves this conclusion.
>
> So, I'm not sure why we use "of all L1-dcache hits" here to describe miss
> ratio,
Yes you're right it should be "of all L1-dcache accesses"
Please send a patch to fix the string and also check if this isn't wrong with some other
ratio too.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists